Figure 1. Farewell shot of crescent Uranus as Voyager 2 departs. January 25, 1986. Range 600,000 miles.
All images in this article are courtesy NASA and JPL, and are in the public domain.



Sol Sun

MercuryMercury ____________

VenusVenus crescent

Earth &
Earth's Moon

Mars Mars: Spirit 
       Sol 30 ____________

Asteroids Vesta

Jupiter Jupiter storm 
       north of Great Red Spot ____________

Saturn Saturn's Rings

Uranus Uranus' Rings

Neptune Neptune

Pluto & Pluto Kuiper Belt

Comets &
Oort Cloud

Comments & Submissions ____________

The Moons and Rings of Uranus

By F. E. Harris

July 27, 2014


Can the Uranus system give us some clues about what to expect, when New Horizons reaches Pluto? Uranus has many moons, and thin rings similar to Pluto. The moons of Uranus are almost as diverse as the moons of Saturn or Jupiter. One of them might be a good analog for Pluto, another for Charon, and so on down the line of Pluto's moons.

Miranda Surface detail
Figure 2. Varied terrain on Miranda indicates complex geologic history. January 24, 1986. Range, 21,000 miles.

When the Voyagers launched in 1977, it was decided they would not visit Pluto, for several good reasons. Neptune's moon Triton, of roughly similar size, served as a sort of stand-in for Pluto, since it was thought the two objects would be fairly similar. As the Voyager mission progressed, we learned that every rocky moon in the outer Solar system is unique. No two could be assumed to be alike.

As ground based telescopes, and the Hubble space telescope studied Pluto in the years that followed Voyager's outer planets flybys, It was found that Pluto may not be very much like Triton. Pluto has its own moons, a part-time atmosphere, and large variations in color and brightness on its surface. Unfortunately, neither ground or space based telescopes could resolve much detail. Mostly, they could only raise questions. The New Horizons space probe would eventually be launched, to resolve the questions. It will reach Pluto next year.


Section 1: The Moons:


Figure 3. Best image of Oberon shows cratering and large peak on moon's lower limb. January 24, 1986. Range 410,000 miles.

The major moons of Uranus, discovered in 1787, were named after the fairy characters in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. Oberon is named after the mythical king of the fairies in the play.

Oberon, also designated Uranus IV, is the outermost major moon of the planet Uranus. It is the second-largest and second most massive of the Uranian moons, and the ninth most massive moon in the Solar System. With large variations in brightness on its surface, it might be the best analog for Pluto. It is about 2/3 the diameter of Pluto. From Wikipedia:

It is likely that Oberon formed from the accretion disk that surrounded Uranus just after the planet's formation. The moon consists of approximately equal amounts of ice and rock, and is probably differentiated into a rocky core and an icy mantle. A layer of liquid water may be present at the boundary between the mantle and the core. The surface of Oberon, which is dark and slightly red in color, appears to have been primarily shaped by asteroid and comet impacts. It is covered by numerous impact craters reaching 210 km in diameter. Oberon possesses a system of chasmata (graben or scarps) formed during crustal extension as a result of the expansion of its interior during its early evolution.



Figure 4. Color composite shows evidence of impact scars and past geologic activity on Titania. January 24, 1986. Range, 300,000 miles.

Titania is the largest of the moons of Uranus and the eighth largest moon in the Solar System, with a diameter of 1,578 kilometres (981 mi). Titania is named after the queen of the fairies in Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. With a diameter that is almost 90% of Pluto, Titania is also a good analog for it. From Wikipedia:

Scientists have recognized three classes of geological feature on Titania: craters, chasmata (canyons) and rupes (scarps). The surface of Titania is less heavily cratered than the surfaces of either Oberon or Umbriel, which means that it is much younger. The crater diameters range from a few kilometers at the low end to 326 kilometers for the largest known crater, Gertrude. Some craters (for instance, Ursula and Jessica) are surrounded by bright impact ejecta (rays) consisting of relatively fresh ice. All large craters on Titania have flat floors and central peaks. The only exception is Ursula, which has a pit in the center. To the west of Gertrude there is an area with irregular topography, the so-called "unnamed basin", which may be another highly degraded impact basin with the diameter of about 330 kilometres (210 mi).
Titania's surface is intersected by a system of enormous faults, or scarps. In some places, two parallel scarps mark depressions in the satellite's crust, forming grabens, which are sometimes called canyons. The most prominent among Titania's canyons is Messina Chasma, which runs for about 1,500 kilometres (930 mi) from the equator almost to the south pole. The grabens on Titania are 20-50 kilometres (12-31 mi) wide and have a relief of about 2-5 km. The scarps that are not related to canyons are called rupes, such as Rousillon Rupes near Ursula crater.

Figure 5. Highest-resolution picture of Titania displays prominent fault valleys nearly 1,000 miles long. January 24, 1986. Range, 229,000 miles.



Figure 6. Mosaic of Ariel, most detailed view from Voyager 2 shows numerous faults and valleys. January 24, 1986. Range, 80,000 miles.

Ariel is the fourth-largest of the moons of Uranus. It is almost exactly half the diameter of Pluto. When I look at Ariel and its deep canyons, it reminds me a good deal of Triton.

When one looks at a globe of Earth, with the oceans romoved, so that the mid-ocean ridges and other signs of plate tectonics are visible, it reminds me a lot of Ariel and Triton. There are clear signs that the ice on each moon was moved around by subsurface convection. The sparse data that we have on Ariel suggests that the surface may be divided into highlands and lowlands, much like Earth's Moon's highlands and marias, or the Earth's continents and oceans. From Wikipedia:

The observed surface of Ariel can be divided into three terrain types: cratered terrain, ridged terrain and plains. The main surface features are impact craters, canyons, fault scarps, ridges and troughs.

The cratered terrain, a rolling surface covered by numerous impact craters and centered on Ariel's south pole, is the moon's oldest and most geographically extensive geological unit. It is intersected by a network of scarps, canyons (graben) and narrow ridges mainly occurring in Ariel's mid-southern latitudes. The canyons, known as chasmata, probably represent graben formed by extensional faulting, which resulted from global tensional stresses caused by the freezing of water (or aqueous ammonia) in the moon's interior ...

The second main terrain type-ridged terrain-comprises bands of ridges and troughs hundreds of kilometers in extent. It bounds the cratered terrain and cuts it into polygons. ...

The youngest terrain observed on Ariel are the plains: relatively low-lying smooth areas that must have formed over a long period of time, judging by their varying levels of cratering. The plains are found on the floors of canyons and in a few irregular depressions in the middle of the cratered terrain. In the latter case they are separated from the cratered terrain by sharp boundaries, which in some cases have a lobate pattern. The most likely origin for the plains is through volcanic processes...

The kinds of terrain seen on Ariel almost demand a nearby planet to provide tidal heating. I think Ariel might be a good analog for Pluto's largest moon, Charon. New Horizons will prove or disprove this theory, next year.



Figure 7. Heavy cratering is seen in this, the most detailed view of Umbriel. January 24, 1986. Range, 346,000 miles.

Umbriel is very dark and cratered, indicating that its surface is very old. Because Pluto is relatively light, I do not consider Umbriel a very good candidate as an analog, but I could be wrong. From Wikipedia:

Umbriel's surface is the darkest of the Uranian moons, and reflects less than half as much light as Ariel, a sister satellite of similar size. Umbriel has a very low Bond albedo of only about 10% as compared to 23% for Ariel. The reflectivity of the moon's surface decreases from 26% at a phase angle of 0° (geometric albedo) to 19% at an angle of about 1°. This phenomenon is called opposition surge. The surface of Umbriel is slightly blue in color, while fresh bright impact deposits (in Wunda crater, for instance) are even bluer. ...

Scientists have so far recognized only one class of geological feature on Umbriel-craters. The surface of Umbriel has far more and larger craters than do Ariel and Titania and shows the least geological activity. ...



Figure 8. Computer mosaic of Miranda images shows varied geologic regions at high resolution. January 24, 1986.

Miranda, the fifth largest moon of Uranus, is so strange that I've included five pictures of it. I think Miranda is probably the best analog for Charon and the smaller moons of Pluto, but the chance of surprise is very high.

Miranda Chevron
Figure 9. Unusual "Chevron" figure seen on approach to Miranda. January 24, 1986. Range, 26,000 miles.

From Wikipedia:

Miranda is the smallest and innermost of Uranus's five major moons. It was discovered by Gerard Kuiper on February 16, 1948. Miranda shows more evidence of past geologic activity than any of the other Uranian satellites. ...

Miranda closest approach
Figure 10. Voyager 2 image of Miranda taken shortly before closest approach. January 24, 1986. Range 19,000 miles.

Miranda's surface has patchwork regions of broken terrain indicating intense geological activity in the moon's past, and is criss-crossed by huge canyons. Large 'racetrack'-like grooved structures, called coronae, may have formed via extensional processes at the tops of diapirs, or upwellings of warm ice. The ridges probably represent extensional tilt blocks. The canyons probably represent graben formed by extensional faulting. Other features may be due to cryovolcanic eruptions of icy magma. The diapirs may have changed the density distribution within the moon, which could have caused Miranda to reorient itself, similar to a process believed to have occurred at Saturn's geologically active moon Enceladus.

Figure 11. Miranda displays rugged, high-elevation terrain (right), lower, grooved terrain and large crater (lower left) 15 miles across. January 24, 1986. Range, 22,000 miles.


Section 2: The Rings:

Rings of Uranus
Figure 12 : Rings of Uranus, including newly discovered 10th ring designated 1986U1R (barely visible below outermost epsilon ring). January 23, 1986. Range, 690,000 miles.

The rings of Pluto are likely to appear as a set of thin circles, as New Horizons approaches, much like the rings of Uranus appear in this picture. There are likely to be small, undiscovered sheperd moons,

 Two shepherd moons of Uranus
Figure 13. Two "shepherd" moons, 1986U7 and 1986U8, with epsilon ring. January 21, 1986. Range, 2.5 million miles.

similar to Uranus' moons 1986U7 and 1986U8. Other small moons that are not shepard moons are liklely to be discovered, like these, of Uranus.

3 small moons of Uranus
Figure 14. Three of the moons discovered by Voyager 2: 1986U1, 1986U3, and 1986U4. January 18, 1986. Range 4.8 million miles.

Only after New Horizons has passed Pluto, will it be apparent what a hazard the rings might have been. This is a shot of Uranus' rings, backlit. It is clear that there are many fine particles that could damage the spacecraft, but which cannot be seen from the sunward side. The short streaks in this photo are stars, some of them showing through the rings.

Rings of Uranus, Backlit
Figure 15. Backlit view shows continuous distribution of fine particles throughout ring system. January 24, 1986. Range, 147,000 miles.

Disclaimer: All information in this article comes from the Voyager space probes, and the Voyager team, either first, second, or third-hand. I have written some text, probably too wordy, with my speculations about which moons are the most likely analogs for Pluto, Charon, and the other small moons of Pluto. I have also quoted extensively from the very good Wikipedia articles on each moon. Links are provided to each article, which in turn references the scientific literature. There is nothing terribly original in my comments. Any errors are mine.

Off TopicFunny Pictures from Orbit

© 2011 F. E. Harris for Hypertek Publications. All Rights Reserved.